In this episode of the Ramos Law Difference Makers Podcast, host Dr. Joe Ramos interviews Michael Kaplan, a senior partner at the law firm DiCaro and Kaplan in New York City. Kaplan is an expert in personal injury and medical malpractice law, with a special focus on traumatic brain injury (TBI). He shares his journey from initially pursuing medicine to discovering his passion for law, ultimately becoming a nationally recognized figure in brain injury litigation and advocacy. Throughout the episode, Kaplan discusses his educational work at George Washington University Law School, where he teaches the only law course in the U.S. dedicated to TBI, and his previous leadership roles in brain injury advocacy organizations.
Kaplan emphasizes the misunderstood and often invisible nature of brain injuries, particularly concussions that may not show physical signs but have profound cognitive, emotional, and behavioral consequences. He critiques the misleading term “mild” brain injury and the lack of appropriate diagnosis in emergency departments. Discussing the legal challenges of proving TBI in court, Kaplan outlines strategies for effectively presenting these cases to juries, including avoiding client presence in court to reduce bias and relying heavily on “before-and-after” witnesses. He also explains how vocational economists and life care planners help quantify damages and future care needs in brain injury cases.
Key Insights
- TBI is Often Misdiagnosed: Over 50% of brain injuries go undiagnosed in emergency settings.
- Invisible Disability: Brain injuries often lack visible symptoms, making courtroom presentation challenging.
- Misleading Terminology: The term “mild” brain injury can downplay serious and lasting effects.
- Importance of Advocacy: Legal and medical systems often fail TBI victims, especially veterans and domestic violence survivors.
- Power of Testimony: Using before-and-after witnesses is more effective than expert testimony alone in persuading juries.
- Workplace Impact: Brain injuries reduce lifetime earnings and job retention capabilities.
- Legal Strategy: Avoid presenting TBI clients in court to prevent visual bias from juries.
- Expert Roles: Life care planners and vocational economists are essential in demonstrating long-term damages.
- Disparities in Recognition: Injuries in athletes and veterans often go unnoticed or unaddressed due to systemic biases.
- Brain Injury as a Civil Rights Issue: Kaplan views brain injury care and recognition as a fundamental human rights matter.
(FAQ) Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main challenge in litigating brain injury cases?
The invisibility of symptoms makes it hard for juries to perceive the injury as serious, especially when clients appear outwardly healthy.
Why are “before-and-after” witnesses critical in TBI trials?
They offer personal insights into how a client’s behavior and abilities changed after the injury, making the damage more relatable and real to jurors.
What does Kaplan suggest instead of showing the client in court?
He advises keeping clients out of the courtroom to avoid jurors forming incorrect conclusions based on appearance alone.
How are long-term damages calculated in TBI cases?
Through input from vocational economists and life care planners who assess earning capacity loss and future care needs.
Why is the term “mild brain injury” problematic?
It understates the severity of potential long-term impacts and misleads both the medical community and legal systems.
Who else is significantly impacted by TBI?
Veterans, athletes, the elderly, and survivors of domestic violence often experience brain injuries that go unrecognized or untreated.
Meet The Contributors
